Writ Challenge: AA Order Defies SC & Physical Evidence
Aug 15, 2026
63 views
0 answers
Employment Law
► The AA upheld my removal by bypassing established law. It dismissed the SC's Witness Rule, claiming internal bank records do not require oral proof. It also penalized me for "missing" documents physically present in the EO's own exhibit list. Finally, the AA sustained a charge by retroactively substituting a 2025 circular with uncharged "prevailing guidelines". Can a High Court quash this under Article 226 for patent perversity?
63 views
0 answers
0 Answers
No answers yet. Be the first to answer this question!
Log in as a legal professional to answer this question.